| [Screamin' Demon] Friday, May 15, 2009 7:45:02 PM | |
|
Not quite most. Personally I don't mind this setlist now, it's a pretty cool one. But it just comes a little ironic. Besides...if out of a setlist of about 18 sngs they had like 8 that were by this line-up...that still leaves plenty of room for Sinner, Dissident Aggressor, Hell Bent For Leather, Breaking The Law, Metal Gods, You've Got Another Thing Comin' and maybe a few other songs. But this setlist they got is cool.
[Show/Hide Quoted Message] (Quoting Message by Bazooka Joe from Friday, May 15, 2009 11:35:14 AM)| |  | Bazooka Joe wrote: | | But then it would be basically denying there entire 70's back catalogue.
To have most of Painkiller, some of AOR and Nostradamus, and then the hits, yeah, not really a good setlist and it would be hard as fuck for Rob to sing. Keep in mind the band, not just what you want to hear.
| | | Cobras-Aura wrote: | | | They seem pretty reluctant to play a set with more heavy songs from this lineup. It comes off ironic considering that back in '89 they wanted to move in this direction, so why not make about half the setlist songs that represent the direction they wanted to go? There's plenty of great songs by this lineup which would be great to see more of in the set. That includes Painkiller, Hell Patrol, All Guns Blazing, Leather Rebel, Metal Meltdown, Night Crawler, Between The Hammer And The Anvil, One Shot At Glory, Judas Rising, Deal With The Devil, Demonizer, Wheels Of Fire, Hellrider, Death, Persecution and Nostradamus. Personally I would enjoy if some of these covered up to half the set. give your thoughts and opinions. |
|
|
|
| [guitardude] Friday, May 15, 2009 4:20:10 PM | |
|
| I`ll be happy with whatever they play, from all or one era, matters not to me!! |
|
| [K2M] Friday, May 15, 2009 2:33:34 PM | |
|
| YES Heavier. With the MARSHALLS and THe Passive Pickups. |
|
| [Bazookajoe_666] Friday, May 15, 2009 11:35:14 AM | |
|
But then it would be basically denying there entire 70's back catalogue.
To have most of Painkiller, some of AOR and Nostradamus, and then the hits, yeah, not really a good setlist and it would be hard as fuck for Rob to sing. Keep in mind the band, not just what you want to hear.
[Show/Hide Quoted Message] (Quoting Message by Cobras-Aura from Friday, May 15, 2009 3:22:41 AM)| | | Cobras-Aura wrote: | | | They seem pretty reluctant to play a set with more heavy songs from this lineup. It comes off ironic considering that back in '89 they wanted to move in this direction, so why not make about half the setlist songs that represent the direction they wanted to go? There's plenty of great songs by this lineup which would be great to see more of in the set. That includes Painkiller, Hell Patrol, All Guns Blazing, Leather Rebel, Metal Meltdown, Night Crawler, Between The Hammer And The Anvil, One Shot At Glory, Judas Rising, Deal With The Devil, Demonizer, Wheels Of Fire, Hellrider, Death, Persecution and Nostradamus. Personally I would enjoy if some of these covered up to half the set. give your thoughts and opinions. |
|
|
| [screaming_4_priest] Friday, May 15, 2009 5:52:08 AM | |
|
| i would rather hear songs off there first 5 albums live and made more heavy by this line up. |
|
| [Screamin' Demon] Friday, May 15, 2009 3:22:41 AM | |
|
| They seem pretty reluctant to play a set with more heavy songs from this lineup. It comes off ironic considering that back in '89 they wanted to move in this direction, so why not make about half the setlist songs that represent the direction they wanted to go? There's plenty of great songs by this lineup which would be great to see more of in the set. That includes Painkiller, Hell Patrol, All Guns Blazing, Leather Rebel, Metal Meltdown, Night Crawler, Between The Hammer And The Anvil, One Shot At Glory, Judas Rising, Deal With The Devil, Demonizer, Wheels Of Fire, Hellrider, Death, Persecution and Nostradamus. Personally I would enjoy if some of these covered up to half the set. give your thoughts and opinions. |
|
