[hellrider 31038] Friday, August 05, 2011 7:19:05 PM
HEELLLLLLLLLL YEAHHHHHHHH HEADBANGER KICK AS? MAN
THANKS ALOT MAN
GONNA HAVE ALOT OF FUN WITH THIS
HEELLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL YEAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
[hellrider 31038] Friday, August 05, 2011 7:14:22 PM
EXCELLENT HEADBANGER.THANK YOU FOR SHARING GOING TO TRY IT OUT.
THIS WILL DEFINATLY COME IN HANDY MAKE SOME VERY EXPLOSIVE LINKS SOON AS YOU PRESS IT EXPLODES RIGHT IN YOUR FACE.
hey all you youtubers. ever want to post a link to a certain point in a vid?
simple
Surprisingly, linking to a specific point in a YouTube is very simple. You simply append a minutes and seconds parameter (e.g. #t=2m30s )to the end of the video link.
Edited at: Friday, August 05, 2011 7:57:57 AM Edited at: Friday, August 05, 2011 7:58:20 AM
Edited at: Friday, August 05, 2011 7:15:00 PM Edited at: Friday, August 05, 2011 7:15:29 PM Edited at: Friday, August 05, 2011 7:17:36 PM
[Head banger] Friday, August 05, 2011 7:59:26 AM
sorry the last post looks so stupid. I cant get the coppied font to change color. so I highlited it and made it worse. if you highlite it with the mouse its readable and may or may not be usefull
[Head banger] Friday, August 05, 2011 7:56:03 AM
hey all you youtubers. ever want to post a link to a certain point in a vid?
simple
Surprisingly, linking to a specific point in a YouTube is very simple. You simply append a minutes and seconds parameter (e.g. #t=2m30s )to the end of the video link.
[hellrider 31038] Monday, August 01, 2011 11:03:36 AM
MY AFRO ( Q TIP LOOK. TOLD I LOOK LIKE A Q TIP.LOL) IS NO MORE EITHER I JUST SHAVED MY HEAD [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by Vaillant 3.0 from Sunday, July 31, 2011 4:11:48 PM)
Vaillant 3.0 wrote:
Beautiful. Now that afro of yours is no more.
guidogodoy wrote:
I used as straightener on mine and now I look like a Japanimation cartoon.
Go GUIDORACERTITAN!
spapad wrote:
my hair is cut short and the only instrument used to cut it was a razor. I like it. HA!!
guidogodoy wrote:
If you are speaking of a firewall and / or WEP (or similar) password, especially if you are using the ones built into the OS or any major internet provider, they are still quite open to attack despite their giving the impression of somewhat infallable security. That was why I posted about different operation systems. Mac users rarely use an antivirus or firewall and me running Chrome (broswer or even the thin-client OS) under linux is so out of the mainstream that it isn't worth the time or energy to hack. Then again, maybe if I were a bank....
Now then, enough of my blather. Let's talk about....um....hair! LOL!
spapad wrote:
OK, I'll check. I bet if I went there today the problem wont exist. Sometimes shit happens. No, I'm not wireless, and what wireless I have in this house is protected from intrusion.
guidogodoy wrote:
Of course, email Jeff as was suggested. Still, are you using a wireless network to do monetary transactions? Do you have a common internet provider? How safe are their servers? Are you sure your bank has a secure server? Only point is that most are dealing with a false sense of security. Remember back when Chase was hacked? Capital One? Best Buy? CitiCorp? JP Morgan? WaMU? I could list a ton more who were compromised. I got two letters during that hack myself.
After my post last night, I checked with a Winbox running Win 7, then another with XP and a final one with Ubuntu Linux. No problems / warning at MGA with any of them. Check the date on your computer first was my only comment. That and the browser and OS (updates) would have been one of the only variables as to why you are getting certificate warnings and I am not.
spapad wrote:
I know that an expired certificate does not automatically mean unsafe, but there is always the chance it's not the real site, and I don't take chances with my personal monetary information. I think I'll email Jeff, just to be sure.
guidogodoy wrote:
Great advice give right below, Spa, but I would make sure the date on your computer is set properly first. I just ordered a few shirts from MGA a few days ago with no certificate warnings.
An expired certificate doesn't necessarily mean "unsafe." I set certificates at work and it does often come down to the user's computer date (month and year).
Browser and OS can also give false positives on the popups for certificates. I just checked again and Firefox / Mac (lion) has no certificate trouble there.
I used as straightener on mine and now I look like a Japanimation cartoon.
Go GUIDORACERTITAN!
spapad wrote:
my hair is cut short and the only instrument used to cut it was a razor. I like it. HA!!
guidogodoy wrote:
If you are speaking of a firewall and / or WEP (or similar) password, especially if you are using the ones built into the OS or any major internet provider, they are still quite open to attack despite their giving the impression of somewhat infallable security. That was why I posted about different operation systems. Mac users rarely use an antivirus or firewall and me running Chrome (broswer or even the thin-client OS) under linux is so out of the mainstream that it isn't worth the time or energy to hack. Then again, maybe if I were a bank....
Now then, enough of my blather. Let's talk about....um....hair! LOL!
spapad wrote:
OK, I'll check. I bet if I went there today the problem wont exist. Sometimes shit happens. No, I'm not wireless, and what wireless I have in this house is protected from intrusion.
guidogodoy wrote:
Of course, email Jeff as was suggested. Still, are you using a wireless network to do monetary transactions? Do you have a common internet provider? How safe are their servers? Are you sure your bank has a secure server? Only point is that most are dealing with a false sense of security. Remember back when Chase was hacked? Capital One? Best Buy? CitiCorp? JP Morgan? WaMU? I could list a ton more who were compromised. I got two letters during that hack myself.
After my post last night, I checked with a Winbox running Win 7, then another with XP and a final one with Ubuntu Linux. No problems / warning at MGA with any of them. Check the date on your computer first was my only comment. That and the browser and OS (updates) would have been one of the only variables as to why you are getting certificate warnings and I am not.
spapad wrote:
I know that an expired certificate does not automatically mean unsafe, but there is always the chance it's not the real site, and I don't take chances with my personal monetary information. I think I'll email Jeff, just to be sure.
guidogodoy wrote:
Great advice give right below, Spa, but I would make sure the date on your computer is set properly first. I just ordered a few shirts from MGA a few days ago with no certificate warnings.
An expired certificate doesn't necessarily mean "unsafe." I set certificates at work and it does often come down to the user's computer date (month and year).
Browser and OS can also give false positives on the popups for certificates. I just checked again and Firefox / Mac (lion) has no certificate trouble there.
[spapad] Sunday, July 31, 2011 9:47:50 AM
That would be a good look for you. Especially if you get the cateye glasses to go with the hair.
I used as straightener on mine and now I look like a Japanimation cartoon.
Go GUIDORACERTITAN!
spapad wrote:
my hair is cut short and the only instrument used to cut it was a razor. I like it. HA!!
guidogodoy wrote:
If you are speaking of a firewall and / or WEP (or similar) password, especially if you are using the ones built into the OS or any major internet provider, they are still quite open to attack despite their giving the impression of somewhat infallable security. That was why I posted about different operation systems. Mac users rarely use an antivirus or firewall and me running Chrome (broswer or even the thin-client OS) under linux is so out of the mainstream that it isn't worth the time or energy to hack. Then again, maybe if I were a bank....
Now then, enough of my blather. Let's talk about....um....hair! LOL!
spapad wrote:
OK, I'll check. I bet if I went there today the problem wont exist. Sometimes shit happens. No, I'm not wireless, and what wireless I have in this house is protected from intrusion.
guidogodoy wrote:
Of course, email Jeff as was suggested. Still, are you using a wireless network to do monetary transactions? Do you have a common internet provider? How safe are their servers? Are you sure your bank has a secure server? Only point is that most are dealing with a false sense of security. Remember back when Chase was hacked? Capital One? Best Buy? CitiCorp? JP Morgan? WaMU? I could list a ton more who were compromised. I got two letters during that hack myself.
After my post last night, I checked with a Winbox running Win 7, then another with XP and a final one with Ubuntu Linux. No problems / warning at MGA with any of them. Check the date on your computer first was my only comment. That and the browser and OS (updates) would have been one of the only variables as to why you are getting certificate warnings and I am not.
spapad wrote:
I know that an expired certificate does not automatically mean unsafe, but there is always the chance it's not the real site, and I don't take chances with my personal monetary information. I think I'll email Jeff, just to be sure.
guidogodoy wrote:
Great advice give right below, Spa, but I would make sure the date on your computer is set properly first. I just ordered a few shirts from MGA a few days ago with no certificate warnings.
An expired certificate doesn't necessarily mean "unsafe." I set certificates at work and it does often come down to the user's computer date (month and year).
Browser and OS can also give false positives on the popups for certificates. I just checked again and Firefox / Mac (lion) has no certificate trouble there.
[guidogodoy] Saturday, July 30, 2011 7:51:21 PM
I used as straightener on mine and now I look like a Japanimation cartoon.
my hair is cut short and the only instrument used to cut it was a razor. I like it. HA!!
guidogodoy wrote:
If you are speaking of a firewall and / or WEP (or similar) password, especially if you are using the ones built into the OS or any major internet provider, they are still quite open to attack despite their giving the impression of somewhat infallable security. That was why I posted about different operation systems. Mac users rarely use an antivirus or firewall and me running Chrome (broswer or even the thin-client OS) under linux is so out of the mainstream that it isn't worth the time or energy to hack. Then again, maybe if I were a bank....
Now then, enough of my blather. Let's talk about....um....hair! LOL!
spapad wrote:
OK, I'll check. I bet if I went there today the problem wont exist. Sometimes shit happens. No, I'm not wireless, and what wireless I have in this house is protected from intrusion.
guidogodoy wrote:
Of course, email Jeff as was suggested. Still, are you using a wireless network to do monetary transactions? Do you have a common internet provider? How safe are their servers? Are you sure your bank has a secure server? Only point is that most are dealing with a false sense of security. Remember back when Chase was hacked? Capital One? Best Buy? CitiCorp? JP Morgan? WaMU? I could list a ton more who were compromised. I got two letters during that hack myself.
After my post last night, I checked with a Winbox running Win 7, then another with XP and a final one with Ubuntu Linux. No problems / warning at MGA with any of them. Check the date on your computer first was my only comment. That and the browser and OS (updates) would have been one of the only variables as to why you are getting certificate warnings and I am not.
spapad wrote:
I know that an expired certificate does not automatically mean unsafe, but there is always the chance it's not the real site, and I don't take chances with my personal monetary information. I think I'll email Jeff, just to be sure.
guidogodoy wrote:
Great advice give right below, Spa, but I would make sure the date on your computer is set properly first. I just ordered a few shirts from MGA a few days ago with no certificate warnings.
An expired certificate doesn't necessarily mean "unsafe." I set certificates at work and it does often come down to the user's computer date (month and year).
Browser and OS can also give false positives on the popups for certificates. I just checked again and Firefox / Mac (lion) has no certificate trouble there.
[hellrider 31038] Saturday, July 30, 2011 7:18:58 PM
If you are speaking of a firewall and / or WEP (or similar) password, especially if you are using the ones built into the OS or any major internet provider, they are still quite open to attack despite their giving the impression of somewhat infallable security. That was why I posted about different operation systems. Mac users rarely use an antivirus or firewall and me running Chrome (broswer or even the thin-client OS) under linux is so out of the mainstream that it isn't worth the time or energy to hack. Then again, maybe if I were a bank....
Now then, enough of my blather. Let's talk about....um....hair! LOL!
spapad wrote:
OK, I'll check. I bet if I went there today the problem wont exist. Sometimes shit happens. No, I'm not wireless, and what wireless I have in this house is protected from intrusion.
guidogodoy wrote:
Of course, email Jeff as was suggested. Still, are you using a wireless network to do monetary transactions? Do you have a common internet provider? How safe are their servers? Are you sure your bank has a secure server? Only point is that most are dealing with a false sense of security. Remember back when Chase was hacked? Capital One? Best Buy? CitiCorp? JP Morgan? WaMU? I could list a ton more who were compromised. I got two letters during that hack myself.
After my post last night, I checked with a Winbox running Win 7, then another with XP and a final one with Ubuntu Linux. No problems / warning at MGA with any of them. Check the date on your computer first was my only comment. That and the browser and OS (updates) would have been one of the only variables as to why you are getting certificate warnings and I am not.
spapad wrote:
I know that an expired certificate does not automatically mean unsafe, but there is always the chance it's not the real site, and I don't take chances with my personal monetary information. I think I'll email Jeff, just to be sure.
guidogodoy wrote:
Great advice give right below, Spa, but I would make sure the date on your computer is set properly first. I just ordered a few shirts from MGA a few days ago with no certificate warnings.
An expired certificate doesn't necessarily mean "unsafe." I set certificates at work and it does often come down to the user's computer date (month and year).
Browser and OS can also give false positives on the popups for certificates. I just checked again and Firefox / Mac (lion) has no certificate trouble there.
[guidogodoy] Saturday, July 30, 2011 5:26:02 PM
If you are speaking of a firewall and / or WEP (or similar) password, especially if you are using the ones built into the OS or any major internet provider, they are still quite open to attack despite their giving the impression of somewhat infallable security. That was why I posted about different operation systems. Mac users rarely use an antivirus or firewall and me running Chrome (broswer or even the thin-client OS) under linux is so out of the mainstream that it isn't worth the time or energy to hack. Then again, maybe if I were a bank....
Now then, enough of my blather. Let's talk about....um....hair! LOL!
OK, I'll check. I bet if I went there today the problem wont exist. Sometimes shit happens. No, I'm not wireless, and what wireless I have in this house is protected from intrusion.
guidogodoy wrote:
Of course, email Jeff as was suggested. Still, are you using a wireless network to do monetary transactions? Do you have a common internet provider? How safe are their servers? Are you sure your bank has a secure server? Only point is that most are dealing with a false sense of security. Remember back when Chase was hacked? Capital One? Best Buy? CitiCorp? JP Morgan? WaMU? I could list a ton more who were compromised. I got two letters during that hack myself.
After my post last night, I checked with a Winbox running Win 7, then another with XP and a final one with Ubuntu Linux. No problems / warning at MGA with any of them. Check the date on your computer first was my only comment. That and the browser and OS (updates) would have been one of the only variables as to why you are getting certificate warnings and I am not.
spapad wrote:
I know that an expired certificate does not automatically mean unsafe, but there is always the chance it's not the real site, and I don't take chances with my personal monetary information. I think I'll email Jeff, just to be sure.
guidogodoy wrote:
Great advice give right below, Spa, but I would make sure the date on your computer is set properly first. I just ordered a few shirts from MGA a few days ago with no certificate warnings.
An expired certificate doesn't necessarily mean "unsafe." I set certificates at work and it does often come down to the user's computer date (month and year).
Browser and OS can also give false positives on the popups for certificates. I just checked again and Firefox / Mac (lion) has no certificate trouble there.
[spapad] Saturday, July 30, 2011 4:55:50 PM
OK, I'll check. I bet if I went there today the problem wont exist. Sometimes shit happens. No, I'm not wireless, and what wireless I have in this house is protected from intrusion.
Of course, email Jeff as was suggested. Still, are you using a wireless network to do monetary transactions? Do you have a common internet provider? How safe are their servers? Are you sure your bank has a secure server? Only point is that most are dealing with a false sense of security. Remember back when Chase was hacked? Capital One? Best Buy? CitiCorp? JP Morgan? WaMU? I could list a ton more who were compromised. I got two letters during that hack myself.
After my post last night, I checked with a Winbox running Win 7, then another with XP and a final one with Ubuntu Linux. No problems / warning at MGA with any of them. Check the date on your computer first was my only comment. That and the browser and OS (updates) would have been one of the only variables as to why you are getting certificate warnings and I am not.
spapad wrote:
I know that an expired certificate does not automatically mean unsafe, but there is always the chance it's not the real site, and I don't take chances with my personal monetary information. I think I'll email Jeff, just to be sure.
guidogodoy wrote:
Great advice give right below, Spa, but I would make sure the date on your computer is set properly first. I just ordered a few shirts from MGA a few days ago with no certificate warnings.
An expired certificate doesn't necessarily mean "unsafe." I set certificates at work and it does often come down to the user's computer date (month and year).
Browser and OS can also give false positives on the popups for certificates. I just checked again and Firefox / Mac (lion) has no certificate trouble there.
[guidogodoy] Saturday, July 30, 2011 4:37:48 PM
Of course, email Jeff as was suggested. Still, are you using a wireless network to do monetary transactions? Do you have a common internet provider? How safe are their servers? Are you sure your bank has a secure server? Only point is that most are dealing with a false sense of security. Remember back when Chase was hacked? Capital One? Best Buy? CitiCorp? JP Morgan? WaMU? I could list a ton more who were compromised. I got two letters during that hack myself.
After my post last night, I checked with a Winbox running Win 7, then another with XP and a final one with Ubuntu Linux. No problems / warning at MGA with any of them. Check the date on your computer first was my only comment. That and the browser and OS (updates) would have been one of the only variables as to why you are getting certificate warnings and I am not.
I know that an expired certificate does not automatically mean unsafe, but there is always the chance it's not the real site, and I don't take chances with my personal monetary information. I think I'll email Jeff, just to be sure.
guidogodoy wrote:
Great advice give right below, Spa, but I would make sure the date on your computer is set properly first. I just ordered a few shirts from MGA a few days ago with no certificate warnings.
An expired certificate doesn't necessarily mean "unsafe." I set certificates at work and it does often come down to the user's computer date (month and year).
Browser and OS can also give false positives on the popups for certificates. I just checked again and Firefox / Mac (lion) has no certificate trouble there.
[spapad] Saturday, July 30, 2011 2:33:20 PM
I know that an expired certificate does not automatically mean unsafe, but there is always the chance it's not the real site, and I don't take chances with my personal monetary information. I think I'll email Jeff, just to be sure.
Great advice give right below, Spa, but I would make sure the date on your computer is set properly first. I just ordered a few shirts from MGA a few days ago with no certificate warnings.
An expired certificate doesn't necessarily mean "unsafe." I set certificates at work and it does often come down to the user's computer date (month and year).
Browser and OS can also give false positives on the popups for certificates. I just checked again and Firefox / Mac (lion) has no certificate trouble there.
[spapad] Saturday, July 30, 2011 2:31:16 PM
But what new song could be just as irritating and leave the person with that song stuck in their head the rest of the day?
HAAA!! Haven't you ever read the kmac thread?
Hey strat! Show him what "to be rickrolled" means! LOL!
Budred wrote:
I had to read that just to see what the hell rickrolled meant.
Never heard that before. I'm old and I'm new to the computer.(Quoting Message by Head banger from Thursday, July 28, 2011 10:25:28 AM)
Head banger wrote:
hey the whitehouse rickrolled someone yesterday. see story below
When's the last time someone was "Rick Rolled" around here...? HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!
Edited at: Thursday, July 28, 2011 7:00:10 PM
[_strat_] Saturday, July 30, 2011 12:10:21 PM
lol! Passed gass?
IDK - I think that the original is great, but it just got a bit old. Needs refreshing. We might have to start looking for a new song. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by spapad from Friday, July 29, 2011 10:16:55 PM)
spapad wrote:
Cute, but not as funny as the original at all. I think it has passed it's time or passed gas.
_strat_ wrote:
Oh, come on, thats sooo 2010.
No rickrolling - instead, here is a great video from a kickass metal band:
HAAA!! Haven't you ever read the kmac thread?
Hey strat! Show him what "to be rickrolled" means! LOL!
Budred wrote:
I had to read that just to see what the hell rickrolled meant.
Never heard that before. I'm old and I'm new to the computer.(Quoting Message by Head banger from Thursday, July 28, 2011 10:25:28 AM)
Head banger wrote:
hey the whitehouse rickrolled someone yesterday. see story below
When's the last time someone was "Rick Rolled" around here...? HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!
Edited at: Thursday, July 28, 2011 7:00:10 PM
[guidogodoy] Saturday, July 30, 2011 1:01:05 AM
Great advice give right below, Spa, but I would make sure the date on your computer is set properly first. I just ordered a few shirts from MGA a few days ago with no certificate warnings.
An expired certificate doesn't necessarily mean "unsafe." I set certificates at work and it does often come down to the user's computer date (month and year).
Browser and OS can also give false positives on the popups for certificates. I just checked again and Firefox / Mac (lion) has no certificate trouble there.
[Eternal Servant] Saturday, July 30, 2011 12:47:03 AM
How about e-mailing to Jeff who's in charge of Metal God Apparel?
ROB!! Just in case you might look in. Which I doubt. But just in case.
Your MetalGodApparel site is now giving my browser all kinds of Warnings not to continue because your certificate has expired in May of this year. I'd love a couple more shirts. Please let the Admin know they have screwed up. Thank you
[spapad] Friday, July 29, 2011 11:05:56 PM
ROB!! Just in case you might look in. Which I doubt. But just in case.
Your MetalGodApparel site is now giving my browser all kinds of Warnings not to continue because your certificate has expired in May of this year. I'd love a couple more shirts. Please let the Admin know they have screwed up. Thank you
[spapad] Friday, July 29, 2011 10:16:55 PM
Cute, but not as funny as the original at all. I think it has passed it's time or passed gas.
HAAA!! Haven't you ever read the kmac thread?
Hey strat! Show him what "to be rickrolled" means! LOL!
Budred wrote:
I had to read that just to see what the hell rickrolled meant.
Never heard that before. I'm old and I'm new to the computer.(Quoting Message by Head banger from Thursday, July 28, 2011 10:25:28 AM)
Head banger wrote:
hey the whitehouse rickrolled someone yesterday. see story below
HAAA!! Haven't you ever read the kmac thread?
Hey strat! Show him what "to be rickrolled" means! LOL!
Budred wrote:
I had to read that just to see what the hell rickrolled meant.
Never heard that before. I'm old and I'm new to the computer.(Quoting Message by Head banger from Thursday, July 28, 2011 10:25:28 AM)
Head banger wrote:
hey the whitehouse rickrolled someone yesterday. see story below
When's the last time someone was "Rick Rolled" around here...? HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!
Edited at: Thursday, July 28, 2011 7:00:10 PM
[Budred] Friday, July 29, 2011 6:17:52 AM
There are a few threads I usually stay out of.
That one,
And now for something completely different,
Sinfully delicious,
and The boxer brief or thongs thread. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by guidogodoy from Thursday, July 28, 2011 10:52:22 PM)
guidogodoy wrote:
HAAA!! Haven't you ever read the kmac thread?
Hey strat! Show him what "to be rickrolled" means! LOL!
Budred wrote:
I had to read that just to see what the hell rickrolled meant.
Never heard that before. I'm old and I'm new to the computer.(Quoting Message by Head banger from Thursday, July 28, 2011 10:25:28 AM)
Head banger wrote:
hey the whitehouse rickrolled someone yesterday. see story below
HAAA!! Haven't you ever read the kmac thread?
Hey strat! Show him what "to be rickrolled" means! LOL!
Budred wrote:
I had to read that just to see what the hell rickrolled meant.
Never heard that before. I'm old and I'm new to the computer.(Quoting Message by Head banger from Thursday, July 28, 2011 10:25:28 AM)
Head banger wrote:
hey the whitehouse rickrolled someone yesterday. see story below
I had to read that just to see what the hell rickrolled meant.
Never heard that before. I'm old and I'm new to the computer.(Quoting Message by Head banger from Thursday, July 28, 2011 10:25:28 AM)
Head banger wrote:
hey the whitehouse rickrolled someone yesterday. see story below
When's the last time someone was "Rick Rolled" around here...? HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!
Edited at: Thursday, July 28, 2011 7:00:10 PM
[Budred] Thursday, July 28, 2011 6:58:42 PM
I had to read that just to see what the hell rickrolled meant.
Never heard that before. I'm old and I'm new to the computer.[Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by Head banger from Thursday, July 28, 2011 10:25:28 AM)
Head banger wrote:
hey the whitehouse rickrolled someone yesterday. see story below
Yesterday I was being trained on a new instrument by a rep from the company. My cellphone went off and I left to take the call. When I came back, the rep said, "OK, I just have to ask.... was that Breaking the Law by Judas Priest as your ringtone?" HAAAAAAAHAHA! METALHEADS, they are everywhere and I LOVE IT!!
[HOT ROCKIN' METAL GODDESS] Wednesday, July 27, 2011 12:02:13 PM
Yesterday I was being trained on a new instrument by a rep from the company. My cellphone went off and I left to take the call. When I came back, the rep said, "OK, I just have to ask.... was that Breaking the Law by Judas Priest as your ringtone?" HAAAAAAAHAHA! METALHEADS, they are everywhere and I LOVE IT!!
[Head banger] Wednesday, July 27, 2011 9:09:21 AM
I need a heavy metal vacation.
drove 2 hours 40 min yesterday, listening to sat radio and the kids playing video games. got in about half a judas priest song in all that time and that was YGATC. FFS play some decent priest. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by Vaillant 3.0 from Wednesday, July 27, 2011 1:07:02 AM)
Vaillant 3.0 wrote:
Okay, when I first saw the article that had "Defending our Island" as part of the title, the first thing I thought was:
....
JUDAS PRIEST HAVE THEIR OWN ISLAND?!?!? HOLY SHEET!
Then I realized they were talking about The UK. Wouldn't it be cool, though? Judas Priest having their own island? Where only the faithful can go and enjoy a Heavy Metal vacation? That'd be sweet!!
Anyway...check out the article. 'Tis pretty good.
Edited at: Wednesday, July 27, 2011 1:10:53 AM
[guidogodoy] Wednesday, July 27, 2011 1:09:18 AM
Read it top to bottom. I agree. Very good. LOVE how Ian is stepping up now.
Okay, when I first saw the article that had "Defending out Island" as part of the title, the first thing I thought was:
....
JUDAS PRIEST HAVE THEIR OWN ISLAND?!?!? HOLY SHEET!
Then I realized they were talking about The UK. Wouldn't it be cool, though? Judas Priest having their own island? Where only the faithful can go and enjoy a Heavy Metal vacation? That'd be sweet!!
Anyway...check out the article. 'Tis pretty good.
[Vaillant 3.0] Wednesday, July 27, 2011 1:07:02 AM
Okay, when I first saw the article that had "Defending our Island" as part of the title, the first thing I thought was:
....
JUDAS PRIEST HAVE THEIR OWN ISLAND?!?!? HOLY SHEET!
Then I realized they were talking about The UK. Wouldn't it be cool, though? Judas Priest having their own island? Where only the faithful can go and enjoy a Heavy Metal vacation? That'd be sweet!!
I dont care if its cool or manly, I dont like cats.
strat, I am a fat anorexic..... HA!!
Budred wrote:
Alot of guys hate cats. It's not manly to like them.
My mom had them when I was young and the wife
and I have had them since we got together so I'm
used to them. Kind of like them actually. Anyway,
hope you took that as humor. Peace man.
Head banger wrote:
cool cat hating dude!
Budred wrote:
HEADBANGER!!!!
I thought you were so cool.
What the hell kind of post is that?
Should have dedicated that video to you instead of Spa.
(Oh' Well, you're still cool, I guess.)
Head banger wrote:
without kittens there would be not cats, improving the world dramaticly.
if I had a time machine, I would go back in time find the damn egyptian that domesticated the cat, then go back to before his birth and kill both his parents.
Vaillant 3.0 wrote:
Without kittens, the world would be a much sadder place to live in.
_strat_ wrote:
It is nice to see someone with a soft heart, who can hear the pleas of innocent little kittens, who do not want to be blown out of existance by the Bee Gees.
Unfortunately, Guido prefers dogs.
Vaillant 3.0 wrote:
KITTY!!!
_strat_ wrote:
You... Wouldnt...
Would you?
guidogodoy wrote:
I think it is as the song goes with you: some "She" has devoured all your sweet love, took all you had and then fed you dirt!"
Shall I break out my BeeGees collection now?
_strat_ wrote:
You own a Monkees CD.
Right. That does it.
guidogodoy wrote:
HERESY!
I thought as much from you, you young bounder. You cad. Thus, I have already prepared my visual response.
Right below. Says quite clearly: Micky Dolenz: guitar! Both CDs autographed! LOL!
_strat_ wrote:
LMAO!
Guido, sit down, take a deep breath... Have a drink..
Here it comes:
The Monkees did not play their own instruments.
The Archies probably did, tho, they sound too good to be made up.
guidogodoy wrote:
OMG! NOOOO!!!
Next, you are going to say something absurd like they didn't play their own instruments either.
_strat_ wrote:
Sure. But you do know that they didnt write their own lyrics, right?
guidogodoy wrote:
Oh don't you dare screw with the Monkees, man! Them's fightin' words! LOL!!!
(plus, they had many more hits than Winger).
The lyrics to this song are some of my favorite:
_strat_ wrote:
Exactyly? I see Freeze hasnt been around much.
Anyway - Yes, Bon Jovi for Winger - would work. Although since we are at it, they might as well swap it for the Monkees - they are probably heavier than either, anyway.
I read minds at CET 0h - 24h, so theres nothing much you can do here.
What I do hope is that the new Beavis and Butthead will make it to MTV Adria soon. Right now the only thing that they are playing is Jersey Shore and all those bullshit Hip hop shows like Short Circuitz and all the rest that all look the same. Humour has never looked as bad as it does now. We need the Brits to start doing some new sitcoms.
guidogodoy wrote:
1. No, man. I am not saying that Beavis and Butthead should change shirts (sacrilige!...unless they changed to a JP shirt, of course) but that the Winger could be swapped out for, say, Bon Jovi!
2. Yeah, I agree that Butthead has always been smarter (hey, who pays the rent?). My comment was meant to compare the Beavis of old to the new incarnation. He seems smarter than he should be. I once heard an interview about the Simpsons and, in particular, Homer. The creators said that he should be only as smart as a dog. Another creator asked for clarification: "yes, but what BREED of dog!?" LOL.
3. EXACTYLY what I thought when I saw "Snookie!" That South Park line! HAAA!!! I told you to quit reading my mind, damnit! At least between the hours of 4-6 (-5GMT). That's GUIDO'S time!
_strat_ wrote:
The t-shirts have to stay as they are for two reasons:
1. There are no modern bands that would be good (or known) enough to take their place
2. I disagree with Beavis being more intelligent - I always thought that Butthead was the smart one, if nothing else because Beavis has the Metallica t-shirt. They should keep it that way.
I must admit Ive watched Jersey Shore once. It was after I watched the South Park episode ("Snooki want smoosh-smoosh!"), which was much better than the original.
Oh, and youth of today doesnt have a clue about what Winger is. They like Lady Gaga, which makes my stomach turn. Not to say that Winger was brilliant, but at least they could dress better.
guidogodoy wrote:
Kinda odd voice, isn't it? I mean, it is still Mike Judge but it seems like he threw every catchphrase and clip into that one little segment trying to re-capture his old audience. Does the youth of today even know who "Winger" is anymore? They should have updated the t-shirts.
I don't know about you but, IMO, Beavis actually sounds too intelligent! As for the Jersey Shore comments, I am glad to say that I have never once seen the show. That was as much as I have ever seen and I daresay that it was too much. Yeah, spoof Gaga. At least she doesn't make my stomach turn.
_strat_ wrote:
I dont like Beavises new voice much either.
It is a good idea that they comment on Jersey Shore, tho. But I think that Lady Gaga videos might be even better.
guidogodoy wrote:
HAAA!! In the sense of humor, who else has seen the new clip for reviving Beavis and Butthead?
Funny but I don't really like the new tone Beavis has to his voice. Yeah, still Mike Judge but it is different. I might be touchy because I liked the old ones and hate messing with perfection.
"I am CORNHOLIO!!"
Alot of guys hate cats. It's not manly to like them.
My mom had them when I was young and the wife
and I have had them since we got together so I'm
used to them. Kind of like them actually. Anyway,
hope you took that as humor. Peace man.
Head banger wrote:
cool cat hating dude!
Budred wrote:
HEADBANGER!!!!
I thought you were so cool.
What the hell kind of post is that?
Should have dedicated that video to you instead of Spa.
(Oh' Well, you're still cool, I guess.)
Head banger wrote:
without kittens there would be not cats, improving the world dramaticly.
if I had a time machine, I would go back in time find the damn egyptian that domesticated the cat, then go back to before his birth and kill both his parents.
Vaillant 3.0 wrote:
Without kittens, the world would be a much sadder place to live in.
_strat_ wrote:
It is nice to see someone with a soft heart, who can hear the pleas of innocent little kittens, who do not want to be blown out of existance by the Bee Gees.
Unfortunately, Guido prefers dogs.
Vaillant 3.0 wrote:
KITTY!!!
_strat_ wrote:
You... Wouldnt...
Would you?
guidogodoy wrote:
I think it is as the song goes with you: some "She" has devoured all your sweet love, took all you had and then fed you dirt!"
Shall I break out my BeeGees collection now?
_strat_ wrote:
You own a Monkees CD.
Right. That does it.
guidogodoy wrote:
HERESY!
I thought as much from you, you young bounder. You cad. Thus, I have already prepared my visual response.
Right below. Says quite clearly: Micky Dolenz: guitar! Both CDs autographed! LOL!
_strat_ wrote:
LMAO!
Guido, sit down, take a deep breath... Have a drink..
Here it comes:
The Monkees did not play their own instruments.
The Archies probably did, tho, they sound too good to be made up.
guidogodoy wrote:
OMG! NOOOO!!!
Next, you are going to say something absurd like they didn't play their own instruments either.
_strat_ wrote:
Sure. But you do know that they didnt write their own lyrics, right?
guidogodoy wrote:
Oh don't you dare screw with the Monkees, man! Them's fightin' words! LOL!!!
(plus, they had many more hits than Winger).
The lyrics to this song are some of my favorite:
_strat_ wrote:
Exactyly? I see Freeze hasnt been around much.
Anyway - Yes, Bon Jovi for Winger - would work. Although since we are at it, they might as well swap it for the Monkees - they are probably heavier than either, anyway.
I read minds at CET 0h - 24h, so theres nothing much you can do here.
What I do hope is that the new Beavis and Butthead will make it to MTV Adria soon. Right now the only thing that they are playing is Jersey Shore and all those bullshit Hip hop shows like Short Circuitz and all the rest that all look the same. Humour has never looked as bad as it does now. We need the Brits to start doing some new sitcoms.
guidogodoy wrote:
1. No, man. I am not saying that Beavis and Butthead should change shirts (sacrilige!...unless they changed to a JP shirt, of course) but that the Winger could be swapped out for, say, Bon Jovi!
2. Yeah, I agree that Butthead has always been smarter (hey, who pays the rent?). My comment was meant to compare the Beavis of old to the new incarnation. He seems smarter than he should be. I once heard an interview about the Simpsons and, in particular, Homer. The creators said that he should be only as smart as a dog. Another creator asked for clarification: "yes, but what BREED of dog!?" LOL.
3. EXACTYLY what I thought when I saw "Snookie!" That South Park line! HAAA!!! I told you to quit reading my mind, damnit! At least between the hours of 4-6 (-5GMT). That's GUIDO'S time!
_strat_ wrote:
The t-shirts have to stay as they are for two reasons:
1. There are no modern bands that would be good (or known) enough to take their place
2. I disagree with Beavis being more intelligent - I always thought that Butthead was the smart one, if nothing else because Beavis has the Metallica t-shirt. They should keep it that way.
I must admit Ive watched Jersey Shore once. It was after I watched the South Park episode ("Snooki want smoosh-smoosh!"), which was much better than the original.
Oh, and youth of today doesnt have a clue about what Winger is. They like Lady Gaga, which makes my stomach turn. Not to say that Winger was brilliant, but at least they could dress better.
guidogodoy wrote:
Kinda odd voice, isn't it? I mean, it is still Mike Judge but it seems like he threw every catchphrase and clip into that one little segment trying to re-capture his old audience. Does the youth of today even know who "Winger" is anymore? They should have updated the t-shirts.
I don't know about you but, IMO, Beavis actually sounds too intelligent! As for the Jersey Shore comments, I am glad to say that I have never once seen the show. That was as much as I have ever seen and I daresay that it was too much. Yeah, spoof Gaga. At least she doesn't make my stomach turn.
_strat_ wrote:
I dont like Beavises new voice much either.
It is a good idea that they comment on Jersey Shore, tho. But I think that Lady Gaga videos might be even better.
guidogodoy wrote:
HAAA!! In the sense of humor, who else has seen the new clip for reviving Beavis and Butthead?
Funny but I don't really like the new tone Beavis has to his voice. Yeah, still Mike Judge but it is different. I might be touchy because I liked the old ones and hate messing with perfection.
"I am CORNHOLIO!!"
When's the last time someone was "Rick Rolled" around here...? HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!
[_strat_] Tuesday, July 26, 2011 6:42:24 AM
Erm... No, that cant be. A cool cat hating dude is like a fat anorexic or a smart Justin Bieber fan. Its just... No. Cant exist. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by Head banger from Monday, July 25, 2011 10:17:44 PM)
Head banger wrote:
cool cat hating dude!
Budred wrote:
HEADBANGER!!!!
I thought you were so cool.
What the hell kind of post is that?
Should have dedicated that video to you instead of Spa.
(Oh' Well, you're still cool, I guess.)
Head banger wrote:
without kittens there would be not cats, improving the world dramaticly.
if I had a time machine, I would go back in time find the damn egyptian that domesticated the cat, then go back to before his birth and kill both his parents.
Vaillant 3.0 wrote:
Without kittens, the world would be a much sadder place to live in.
_strat_ wrote:
It is nice to see someone with a soft heart, who can hear the pleas of innocent little kittens, who do not want to be blown out of existance by the Bee Gees.
Unfortunately, Guido prefers dogs.
Vaillant 3.0 wrote:
KITTY!!!
_strat_ wrote:
You... Wouldnt...
Would you?
guidogodoy wrote:
I think it is as the song goes with you: some "She" has devoured all your sweet love, took all you had and then fed you dirt!"
Shall I break out my BeeGees collection now?
_strat_ wrote:
You own a Monkees CD.
Right. That does it.
guidogodoy wrote:
HERESY!
I thought as much from you, you young bounder. You cad. Thus, I have already prepared my visual response.
Right below. Says quite clearly: Micky Dolenz: guitar! Both CDs autographed! LOL!
_strat_ wrote:
LMAO!
Guido, sit down, take a deep breath... Have a drink..
Here it comes:
The Monkees did not play their own instruments.
The Archies probably did, tho, they sound too good to be made up.
guidogodoy wrote:
OMG! NOOOO!!!
Next, you are going to say something absurd like they didn't play their own instruments either.
_strat_ wrote:
Sure. But you do know that they didnt write their own lyrics, right?
guidogodoy wrote:
Oh don't you dare screw with the Monkees, man! Them's fightin' words! LOL!!!
(plus, they had many more hits than Winger).
The lyrics to this song are some of my favorite:
_strat_ wrote:
Exactyly? I see Freeze hasnt been around much.
Anyway - Yes, Bon Jovi for Winger - would work. Although since we are at it, they might as well swap it for the Monkees - they are probably heavier than either, anyway.
I read minds at CET 0h - 24h, so theres nothing much you can do here.
What I do hope is that the new Beavis and Butthead will make it to MTV Adria soon. Right now the only thing that they are playing is Jersey Shore and all those bullshit Hip hop shows like Short Circuitz and all the rest that all look the same. Humour has never looked as bad as it does now. We need the Brits to start doing some new sitcoms.
guidogodoy wrote:
1. No, man. I am not saying that Beavis and Butthead should change shirts (sacrilige!...unless they changed to a JP shirt, of course) but that the Winger could be swapped out for, say, Bon Jovi!
2. Yeah, I agree that Butthead has always been smarter (hey, who pays the rent?). My comment was meant to compare the Beavis of old to the new incarnation. He seems smarter than he should be. I once heard an interview about the Simpsons and, in particular, Homer. The creators said that he should be only as smart as a dog. Another creator asked for clarification: "yes, but what BREED of dog!?" LOL.
3. EXACTYLY what I thought when I saw "Snookie!" That South Park line! HAAA!!! I told you to quit reading my mind, damnit! At least between the hours of 4-6 (-5GMT). That's GUIDO'S time!
_strat_ wrote:
The t-shirts have to stay as they are for two reasons:
1. There are no modern bands that would be good (or known) enough to take their place
2. I disagree with Beavis being more intelligent - I always thought that Butthead was the smart one, if nothing else because Beavis has the Metallica t-shirt. They should keep it that way.
I must admit Ive watched Jersey Shore once. It was after I watched the South Park episode ("Snooki want smoosh-smoosh!"), which was much better than the original.
Oh, and youth of today doesnt have a clue about what Winger is. They like Lady Gaga, which makes my stomach turn. Not to say that Winger was brilliant, but at least they could dress better.
guidogodoy wrote:
Kinda odd voice, isn't it? I mean, it is still Mike Judge but it seems like he threw every catchphrase and clip into that one little segment trying to re-capture his old audience. Does the youth of today even know who "Winger" is anymore? They should have updated the t-shirts.
I don't know about you but, IMO, Beavis actually sounds too intelligent! As for the Jersey Shore comments, I am glad to say that I have never once seen the show. That was as much as I have ever seen and I daresay that it was too much. Yeah, spoof Gaga. At least she doesn't make my stomach turn.
_strat_ wrote:
I dont like Beavises new voice much either.
It is a good idea that they comment on Jersey Shore, tho. But I think that Lady Gaga videos might be even better.
guidogodoy wrote:
HAAA!! In the sense of humor, who else has seen the new clip for reviving Beavis and Butthead?
Funny but I don't really like the new tone Beavis has to his voice. Yeah, still Mike Judge but it is different. I might be touchy because I liked the old ones and hate messing with perfection.
"I am CORNHOLIO!!"
Thats great! The orange one is the best. I always thought that orange cats had more temperament. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by Budred from Monday, July 25, 2011 9:40:38 AM)
Budred wrote:
Spa, I can't believe you don't like cats. Sometimes they are adorable.
My wife is allergic to them also. She gets nasty red welts if they scratch her
and when they're shedding it gets her sneezing but she still likes them. Our
cat sleeps on her for hours on end sometimes. She filmed these two playing
on our back steps. She put it on her youtube page this morning. I labeled it
Brutal cat fight to f#ck with people.
spapad wrote:
If he likes cats, then we should ship them all to him. Dreadful dander creatures.
_strat_ wrote:
You two better be joking.
If you are not, however... I might have to call an old friend.
Spa, I can't believe you don't like cats. Sometimes they are adorable.
My wife is allergic to them also. She gets nasty red welts if they scratch her
and when they're shedding it gets her sneezing but she still likes them. Our
cat sleeps on her for hours on end sometimes. She filmed these two playing
on our back steps. She put it on her youtube page this morning. I labeled it
Brutal cat fight to f#ck with people.
spapad wrote:
If he likes cats, then we should ship them all to him. Dreadful dander creatures.
_strat_ wrote:
You two better be joking.
If you are not, however... I might have to call an old friend.
HEADBANGER!!!!
Sometimes they are adorable.